Meaningful Use program has steered the healthcare reforms and changes for the last few years. It has immersed many changes, such as incorporation of the certified Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems to maximize the quality, security, and efficacy of health as well as to lessen the lack of correspondence in the healthcare industry.
Through Meaningful Use program, The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) targeted better clinical outcomes, improved population increased efficiency and productive use healthcare technologies. Furthermore, the program set specific objectives to qualify for CMS incentive payments.
Eventually, it is expected that the compliance of Meaningful Use program in the healthcare industry will lead to improved clinical outcomes, better public health, improved precision and competence and more meaningful data for investigations in the field of population health.
Recently a group of United States Senators put forth legislation to make the Meaningful Use program more flexible for health care providers. “Our bill ensures that unnecessary regulatory burdens do not continue to negatively affect providers’ ability to leverage technology to improve patient care,” said Senator John Thune, R-South Dakota.
The American Medical Association has pronounced that the doctors spend considerably additional time to manage EHR systems and compliance related tasks in their routine. So, the new set of rules and regulations is there to lower the responsibility of record keeping that the medical and healthcare providers experience in light of the meaningful use program.
The pessimistic fallouts of this program are of the primary importance as well. The new bill made an emphasis on the main aspects of the Meaningful Use program that need serious attention of the lawmakers:
1) The process of data entry is time-consuming, opposing to the delivery of patient care. 2) There are quite a lot of sections that do not need to be filled as part of data entry, and that is unnecessary and irrelevant. Those sections have no link with the delivery of health and medical care to the patient.3) The bill seeks flexibility for providers seeking hardship exemptions for the 2017 EHR reporting period and payment adjustments for 2019.
Regardless of the implementation of EHRs in the practices, many healthcare providers who made it to the Stage 2 of Meaningful Use are unfortunately quite less. So, this new call for action would try to systemize the reporting period of Meaningful Use of 90-days. Also, it would overturn the segment of the present law for making the program flexible in due course.
Some other alterations are comprised of:
1) From Meaningful Use, elimination of the “All-Or-Nothing” approach which puts an excessive burden on healthcare providers and organizations. 2) It asks for the building of a new doorway that makes it convenient for hospitals to comply more flexibly with the requirements.3) It is also seeking flexibility in assessing the performance of MIPS eligible professionals under the merit-based incentive payment system.
“The use of electronic health records has the potential to revolutionize patient care,” said a senator. “But if we want electronic health records to work for providers and patients, we have to provide relief from unrealistic and burdensome requirements and build flexibility within the program.”
Healthcare providers are emphasizing these issues concerning Meaningful Use for many years, demanding substitution or a more flexible approach to comply with the requirements of the Meaningful Use program requirements. The current government is pondering on all those demands by the healthcare organizations and physician practices to curb unrealistic rules and policies that are making compliance difficult for a majority of healthcare providers. These recent amendments can bring in flexibility and respite for health care providers.